While this isn't a factor of the lawsuit, if PCMR loses this they are threatening to remove all lifts from the mountain.
Link: http://unofficialnetworks.com/park-city-loses-lawsuit-vail-dismantle-remove-lifts-130034/
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
john18061806Knowing what vail has done to a local hill near me, promising millions in improvements and literally doing nothing except adding epic passes and stupid marketing campaigns... I really don't trust them at all, park city is awesome as it is and vail better keep their hands off of that.
Turd.FergusonYou really think if Vail purchases/leases/manages PCMR you will see a difference. Canyons didn't have any different "feel" to it. Most of Vail's resorts all have their own personality and uniqueness. Have you ever skied Kirkwood? It's world's different from Heavenly, let alone Beaver Creek.
Vail purchasing PCMR wouldn't take the ski town of out Park City. In reality, once the dust settles from the purchase, very few people will notice a difference. I'm sure there will be a bit of a shake up regarding higher management at PCMR, but other than that, the town of Park City will continue to be awesome
dylholefuck vail/ Talisker Holdings LLC. and their bureaucratic approach to something that wants nothing of them[/url]
dylholeJust out of curiosity, what does everyone see as the downside to having Vail own/manage PC Mr?
Barefootin_Fiendit's not like vail doesn't have the means to replace them....
snow_is_funyes but it would be a pain in the ass for them
Sh4dowThat's what they want, yeah. Not going to happen though.
DeebieSkeebiesI also feel like it would take them a good while for them to build a bunch of new lifts, Meaning we probably won't get to ski it right away
Turd.Fergusonif i go to utah i wouldn't feel obligated to ski pcmr anyways. so many better mountains around
pussyfooterEven though PC doesnt have the best terrain to ski, shreding park laps at PC is still one of the best things to do in utah in the winter, that is if you like skiing park. I love shredding pow, wide open bowls, trees and such but something about a bluebird 30 degree day at PC thats fucking awesome.
last_tangoAnd even then park city has Jupiter if you want to go to a bowl. By no means though is it comparable to the bird for that type of riding though.
john18061806Knowing what vail has done to a local hill near me, promising millions in improvements and literally doing nothing except adding epic passes and stupid marketing campaigns... I really don't trust them at all, park city is awesome as it is and vail better keep their hands off of that.
SchmaelzleVail runs an excellent business but I can't say the same for how they run a ski resort. I've been a little closer to the Talisker/Vail transition than you, dude, and I haven't been very impressed. They did not seem to care about the employees (especially the ski instructors), and most of all, they fucked up the change of hands of Canyons ski patrol.
With Olympic trials held at PCMR and Woodward moving in, Vail just wants in on the amazing revenue our Olympic legacy past and present will bring to this town in the next few years - specifically in the freeskiing/freestyle/snowboarding world. Vail assumes they're owed involvement in that and they're going to badger their way in to it.
PCMR admitted to the mistake with the lease, but Talisker also conveniently misplaced several correspondence with Powdr about renewal dates on the lease. Talisker did a wonderful sleight-of-hand on this and now it looks like PCMR is totally to blame.
PCMR owns their base, their equipment, and their water rights outright. If Talisker/Vail really do play hardball PCMR can fuck them, and this town, over very hard. The question then is who is Woodward going to sue...