It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
People who do cork 180s carve hard and then use the spin to bring themselves back around. If someone threw a cork zero it would probably be a flailing mess since they wouldn't be spinning.
OP you know how I know u gape? cork zero (the name of the trick proves its impossibility as a corking maneuver implies spinning.) a better name for your trick would be the mummy or the dead body. you should go for it though find the biggest jump around, make sure the red light is on, straight line it, lay it out, dont spin, find a way to regain your feet under you, stomp that shit, afterbang like a boss!!!
at first i was all "are you kidding me, this is a stupid thread" but as i read through it i became curious and realized a cork zero could be possible although i don't know if it would be called a crop zero but rather an off axis crazy shifty...
So easy to forget adam delorme carving what can only be called a cork zero spin.
http://vimeo.com/6671391
14:12
There's another edit with a different angle I think.
im thinking of peps "trick" from a while back where he spins one way then the other. wouldnt it be conceivable to go corked- off axis- in a zero, and somehow bring it back upright to land.
Wouldnt that just be a lean? If you "cork" in other words get off axis, but you're not spinning I feel like it would have a different name since the definition of a cork is an off axis SPIN, but maybe a huge superman where you get your feet back under you is what your looking for?
BeachBall, I am talking about carving into a jump and having ones feet parallel to their head essentially. I know a cork is considered a "spin" but I feel that definition was made without the realization that an off axis no spin might indeed be possible