Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
SHAWSHANK REDEMTION or PULP FICTION
Posts: 572
-
Karma: 10
settling a debate between me and my freind for best movie ever, just pick which one you think is better and it will be settled once and for all
...
Posts: 3120
-
Karma: 25
right dude. its not a matter of ego, its just a matter of debate. when i write shit like that, i'm not like 'ooooh i fuckin bitch slapped that pussy,' its more like 'hmmn, this is what i think, i wonder how he'll respond?'
'skinny dipping sesh, later.' - laguna beach.
Posts: 1525
-
Karma: 163
It is tied at 16 to 16 but with my vote, that make SHAWSHANK the CLEAR WINNER with 17 votes. end of story.
...
Posts: 3120
-
Karma: 25
^actually your vote counts for negative 89 votes since you only have 25 posts, now go to sleep.
'skinny dipping sesh, later.' - laguna beach.
Posts: 3131
-
Karma: 528
pulp fiction is a sik movie, but havent seen shawshank
stix and snow will break my bones and i will bleed profusely
Posts: 560
-
Karma: 13
pulp straight up
-:Carpe Poon:-
Posts: 469
-
Karma: 10
Shawshank told a better story but Pulp was better writen and directed and cast, so im goin with pulp
1918
Posts: 2584
-
Karma: 58
shawshank was dank
Style is Everythang
burn it down
peace up
Posts: 3120
-
Karma: 25
thats exactly it, thats what pulp fiction has over shawshank, that it was a better told story. tarantino uses non linear structure perfectly and really pulls you into the situation of each character. you may think shawshank is a better story, but it isn't told better - although i guess thats just my opinion.
'skinny dipping sesh, later.' - laguna beach.
Posts: 2573
-
Karma: 13
pulp fiction
i'm republican
i hate bill o'reilly
Posts: 2197
-
Karma: 10
Its a tie; Pulp Fiction for Ving Rames and Samuel L Jackson and Shawshank Redemption for Morgan Freemans great performance
All times are Eastern (-5)
