It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
if its as it says in the picture that somebody is more sad because a fictional character of a dog died in a film, than a person dying in real life, then yeah its not logical. clearly they haven't had somebody close to them die. I can kind of understand that you would be sad about the death of the character of the dog as film-makers make you build a emotional relationship with the characters in their film, over the death of somebody you didnt know, or barely knew as you don't have any form of relationship,
people need to get a grip and realise, its just a film, the dog hasn't actually died.
it flows really weird, I don't think it's the time to employ the contracted form of ''you are''. But I just find it generally strange that girls take these bizarre pictures of pieces of paper