Replying to Sick of all the ski movie arguments

i'm getting really tired of all this constant argument about "which ski movie is better" or "which skier is funner to watch" ect... the point of having multiple ski movies is so that they're DIFFERENT. whats the point of saying MSP or TGR are bad because they don't have urban, or saying Level 1 doesn't have enough big mountain? they each display the progression of the sport in different areas, and have the most bad-ass skiing in different areas... who cares if some movies like MSP have voice over.. i personally like i feel like it makes it more a movie with flow and not a really long edit... but if you don't, big deal. I think the only aspect of movies worth debating (at least between pro movies) is the editing/filming... but i hear so many people saying stuff like "MSP wasn't that great cause it wasn't well rounded.... and then talking about how "well rounded" level 1 is.... I love level 1 flicks but their definitely not "well rounded"... most of their big mountain/back country wouldn't even come close to making a TGR or msp movie... additionally... if all movies filmed the same skiers, and the same stuff, had the same sound track and the same format why the hell would you ever want to watch more than 1... personally.. i love how different the ski movie companies are cause it makes it interesting to see the different areas the sport is going... each of them just and crazy and progressive as the other.