Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

WTT: My Lizzies for Bacons

profile picture
El_Barto.
Posts: 11661 - Karma: 24,353
yep, thats pretty much the deal. My 2010 lizzies have been mounted once for a rossifreeski 140xxl at dead center for a 293 BSL. they have been used only a handful of times, never hit a rail and look brand new. Bacons must have only 1 mount and be in good condition. 182s only. pics in my profile, detailed pics if there is serious interest

NOT FOR SALE
Sep 5 2010 6:43PM
0 0
profile picture
El_Barto.
Posts: 11661 - Karma: 24,353
bump. i would consider other skis as well, at least 110 in the waist and >180
Sep 6 2010 1:37PM
0 0
profile picture
jibjunkie
Posts: 3807 - Karma: 191
according to your quiver you already have bacons.....
Sep 6 2010 1:48PM
0 0
profile picture
El_Barto.
Posts: 11661 - Karma: 24,353
and i love em, and thats why i want more of the pre rocker editions while i can get em fairly new. i use them more than the rest of my quiver combined, so i can justify having a backup pair
Sep 6 2010 1:53PM
0 0
profile picture
jibjunkie
Posts: 3807 - Karma: 191
https://www.newschoolers.com/ns/forums/readthread/thread_id/559780/
Sep 6 2010 2:04PM
0 0
profile picture
B-runge
Posts: 16558 - Karma: 361
that is fucking ridiculous....

lizzys rule also

lizys + bacons way better than bacosn + bacons
Sep 6 2010 3:19PM
0 0
profile picture
RascalWaterMox
Posts: 1288 - Karma: 163
disagree... i had lizzies and i loved them... but they were just a tad too short for me... therefore...

2 pairs of skis you'll use > 1 pair you'll use and 1 pair you don't...
Sep 6 2010 5:30PM
0 0
profile picture
B-runge
Posts: 16558 - Karma: 361
pshh people just need to use lizzys for what they are meant for and there would be no complaints
Sep 6 2010 5:48PM
0 0
profile picture
RascalWaterMox
Posts: 1288 - Karma: 163
haha exactly where they struggled for me... park.

they were too short and SOFT on jumps about 50+ feet... they'd bend in half with my weight and loop out if you didnt land perfectly... they rule in pow trees, rails, and small-medium jump... but just didnt cut it for the bigger jumps...

it's physics... im sure you wouldnt say the statement above to a certain size right? someone who weighs 200 pounds would struggle on lizzies ya know?

i bet this kid just prefers the length and stability of the 182 to the 172...
Sep 6 2010 5:55PM
0 0
profile picture
B-runge
Posts: 16558 - Karma: 361
true i would never take lizzys on big jumps it would be terrifying
haha
Sep 6 2010 5:57PM
0 0
profile picture
RascalWaterMox
Posts: 1288 - Karma: 163
haha +K for admitting it's sketch on large jumps haha.
Sep 6 2010 6:01PM
0 0
profile picture
B-runge
Posts: 16558 - Karma: 361
well where i live the parks are extremely shitty so lizzys = da bomb

but if i lived in like breck or something i think they would be on the bottom of the list
Sep 6 2010 6:03PM
0 0
profile picture
chardi
Posts: 5040 - Karma: 59
i disagree.

when i have bacon, and then its all gone, i want more bacon plain and simple. and no elizabeth could ever top that... unless she makes me more bacon.
Sep 6 2010 6:05PM
0 0
profile picture
B-runge
Posts: 16558 - Karma: 361
(insert sir francis infront of bacon)
you=gay
Sep 6 2010 6:06PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)