It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Since the two main competitors for this round of first person shooters have released gameplay footage, (noone likes halo reach), Im thinking medal of honor looks way sicker than cod: blackops. Its something that looks like newer gameplay without all the bs that happens in cod games. ex: you cant run around with noobtubes only all game and go 40-5 easily. Heres the two beta videos:
Looks decent but im tired of these shooters, they're all pretty similar.
MoH had one decent game... i forget which one but it had the level which was esentially the opening scene of saving private ryan and it was fucking dope. But the rest of the game was shit and you were pretty much a 1 man army.
The relatively recent MoH games have been pretty shit too.
to me it looks like a mix of bad company. customizable classes but smaller, cod4 like maps. thats why i dont like bad company games. the maps are too big.
Would be cool to see an FPS with proper fully destructable environments... realistic craters forming from mortar strikes etc along with walls collapsing etc etc.
Is MOH like doing a huge revamp or something? Because MOH sucks. Its always one really fun level that they get all the trailer shots from and then everything else is mediocre. Back in the day before COD was out it was acceptable, but not anymore.
Yeah, their multiplayer is being made by DICE now, or at least for this years. It looks identical to BFBC2 though, same engine, so if you have BC2 and you didn't like it, you're probably not going to like MoH's multiplayer. Now, I don't know about singleplayer, but that is being made by a different company.
BFBC2 was the second worst in the series. BFBC was the worst. You haven't played many battlefield games have you. It doesn't get much press because of the enormous learning curve, especially in BF2. Any battlefield game is better than any COD game.
CoD2 and BF2 were the best of the franchise... Although CoD4 was pretty fucking good also. Its a matter of preference really. BF games can be absolutely epic, but can also be frustratingly shit if youre not playing with good people.
oh, you grizzled old veterans, cant like anything that's not counterstrike. you guys have it so tough.. (in grandpa simpson voice) IN MY DAY, THERE WAS NO AUTO AIM AND THERE WAS SO MUCH RECOIL BLAH BLAH BLAH
I really hope your kidding about Reach... come September that's gonna be the only game I play for like a year. To me all of these games look the exact same with a few minor differences in between.
Like that MoH game looks like someone just took cod4 and bfbc2, combined them and then re-title it..... No actual work other then slight adjustments.
And black ops just looks like another cod game that's gonna piss everyone off like mw2 did, just with a better campaign.