Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Line Invader Length question

profile picture
Squid.
Posts: 1904 - Karma: 23
I'm 5'9" 145 lbs and I'm new to freestyle skiing. I saw a sick deal on some Line Invaders, but I was too late to grab the 178 length. Would the 171 be too short? I already have an all mountain charging ski, so these will be purely park and mostly rails.

Thanks!
Jan 6 2009 3:25PM
0 0
profile picture
Commonwealth
Posts: 3729 - Karma: 11
171 will be OK, especially if you are starting out. And the Invaders are cheap enough where you won't break the bank if you decide to get new skis next year.
Jan 6 2009 3:36PM
0 0
profile picture
Aaaron.
Posts: 11817 - Karma: 903
it will be easier to pick tricks up on a 171.   you will be fine.
but consider picking up a new pair from www.tramdock.com maybe sometime in the off season, for next year.
Jan 6 2009 3:41PM
0 0
profile picture
Squid.
Posts: 1904 - Karma: 23
The pair I'm getting IS new, $172 on d-structure for the 2008. But I just got a super duper code to backcountry.com that makes it $450 for this years Invaders + bindings in the size I want. It would be like$ 410 for last years invaders + bindings in a size im not sure about, so I have no clue.
Jan 6 2009 3:47PM
0 0
profile picture
zues
Posts: 6434 - Karma: -5,330
171s will work fine man.
Jan 6 2009 7:06PM
0 0
profile picture
Squid.
Posts: 1904 - Karma: 23
thanks for the feedback guys but suddenly some 178s appeared :D

nothing says WIN like finding some awesome skis for $172 :D
Jan 6 2009 7:32PM
0 0
profile picture
PKalow
Posts: 254 - Karma: 11
I'd deff get those 178's if you still can, I'm like 5'6" or 5'7" and I have the 171's and they're not at all too long, they're light and soft so extra length is kinda nice.
Jan 6 2009 7:57PM
0 0
profile picture
Style+eeze
Posts: 6901 - Karma: 551
nooooo. having extra length isn't always nice... say in the park, when you're spinning super fast off of a jump. it's only more of a chance to catch an edge. in park, you should go smaller probably (171) because you don't need all mountain performance becase of your other skis...
this is probably confusing, but go 171.
Jan 6 2009 8:45PM
0 0
profile picture
Squid.
Posts: 1904 - Karma: 23
Turns out my parents don't think I need 2 pairs of skis.. :P thanks anyways fellas
Jan 6 2009 8:49PM
0 0
profile picture
Commonwealth
Posts: 3729 - Karma: 11
I'm in the same boat, man. Even though it's my money, my mom doesn't think I need a pair of Live Lifes!
Jan 6 2009 10:15PM
0 0
profile picture
Jballz
Posts: 1638 - Karma: 79
171s are fine.
Jan 6 2009 10:22PM
0 0
profile picture
Squid.
Posts: 1904 - Karma: 23
ya same :\ even though my dad has a road bike, a mountain bike, and a triathalon bike, he doesnt understand the need for more than one pair of skis
Jan 6 2009 10:35PM
0 0
profile picture
B-runge
Posts: 16558 - Karma: 361
same thing. its my money and i already bought another pair of skis with it. but im way to afraid to ask em if i can buy another pair. i see such good deals all the time and i want them. same thing with goggles
Jan 7 2009 12:41AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)