This is the wrong place to ask, but I have a presentation to do tommorow, and I have been stuck for a few hours trying to figure out what I was going to write.
You probably need to have read Swinburne to understand this, so if you can help me PM me and I will send you a link to the question, but it is basically asking to justify if Swinburne was succesful in proving God permitted his creatures to suffer much evil, and if you agree with that view, defend it against the fact that god could have achieved his goal with much less suffering and evil.
Reply only if you know what you're talking about please.