Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Weight of reactors

profile picture
GUITARisLIFE3
Posts: 21 - Karma: 10
does anyone know how many pounds LINE reactors are? either that or the conversion from grams to pounds



lifes a bitch and so am I
May 1 2005 9:34AM
0 0
profile picture
vincepru
Posts: 5474 - Karma: 17
who the fuck cares, their sick nasty. you cant tell since their under foot, unless your realy realy weak.

OHIO SUPERCOMMANDOS
May 1 2005 1:15PM
0 0
profile picture
crooks
Posts: 14693 - Karma: 786
8 lbs alltogether


RED SOX 2004 WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS
May 1 2005 1:47PM
0 0
profile picture
GUITARisLIFE3
Posts: 21 - Karma: 10
like 8 pounds each or both together is 8 pounds cause if thats it, screw all u people saying its too heavy



lifes a bitch and so am I
May 1 2005 6:49PM
0 0
profile picture
SeanHolmz
Posts: 477 - Karma: 11
8 lbs both of them

you are one giant piece of internet suck -...focus....
May 1 2005 7:03PM
0 0
profile picture
3ski6guy0
Posts: 9201 - Karma: 132
they feel like nothing when you ski them. unless you have chicken legs you can handle them

--------------------------------
-Jon

go to jibij
May 1 2005 7:17PM
0 0
profile picture
GUITARisLIFE3
Posts: 21 - Karma: 10
SICK! so theyre 4 pounds each im deff getting a pair



lifes a bitch and so am I
May 1 2005 7:17PM
0 0
profile picture
vincepru
Posts: 5474 - Karma: 17
^word

OHIO SUPERCOMMANDOS
May 1 2005 7:19PM
0 0
profile picture
D-40
Posts: 6050 - Karma: 100
why wouldy ou base what bindings you get soley on weight?

May 1 2005 7:19PM
0 0
profile picture
bret
Posts: 2845 - Karma: 833
they weigh shit fuck a lot and the people who say it weighs nuffin cuz it's underfoot spit bullshit. i've skied 1260's with reactors and with salomon S810ti's. there is SO much difference. plus they explode into eleventy million pieces upon landing, which is no good.






my level of radness... it just can't... be quantified.
May 2 2005 2:25AM
0 0
profile picture
SmoKinSkier
Posts: 5501 - Karma: 20
I reallly dont notice that much differnce from my 810s to reactors but thats me. There is a bit of plastic on the bindings and they have been known to explode but stick to it and within a few years the bindings will be bananas!!

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


Skiing isn't a matter of life and death. It's much more important than that!'

I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just gonna ask where they're going and hook up with 'em later"
May 2 2005 4:19AM
0 0
profile picture
skogenchick
Posts: 1386 - Karma: -3
if ur getting the reactors make sure to put them on lines bc i had to put a plate on my k2s to use reactors on them and it made then super heavy, like u cant carry them w/ one arm heavy

'SKIING IS FOR LITTLE FAT KIDS.' --RIDE snowboards
May 2 2005 7:53AM
0 0
profile picture
TeenageWasteland
Posts: 1237 - Karma: 10
The weight doesn't matter because it's underfoot so you don't notice it at all when you are spinning

------------------- Jib and Huck...livin life to the best
May 2 2005 11:08AM
0 0
profile picture
3ski6guy0
Posts: 9201 - Karma: 132
skogenchick, are you fuckin serious?? the freedom plate doesnt weigh anything at all.

and yes i can feel a difference between my reactors and a pair of salomon s810 tis, but i HATE light bindings now. everytime i ride a light setup i feel too unstable. the reactors make jumping, popping, buttering, triple backflipping no more difficult than with any other binding. dont be such a cunt...to everyone who bitches about weight

--------------------------------
-Jon

go to jibij
May 2 2005 10:11PM
0 0
profile picture
WONTON
Posts: 6951 - Karma: 55
dont compare them to salomons...salomons are super light. theyre more comparible to look/rossi

Jeepers Creepers, where'd you get the neat sneakers?!?! hehehe giggle giggle giggle
May 2 2005 10:13PM
0 0
profile picture
Jeff_Lo
Posts: 5809 - Karma: 263
ok, seriously, if you care that much about the weight of a binding go to a shop, yea haveing light bindings to hike with is nice, but as far as you knee goes and performance goes itll make it worth it...who cares



I wish i was a gangster
May 2 2005 10:58PM
0 0
profile picture
GUITARisLIFE3
Posts: 21 - Karma: 10
im not a pussy about weight beleive me im just curious cause i wanted a medium weight ski after coming off of heavy atomic c:3's which arent even twin tips, so ill have a medium weight ski with light 1260s and somewhat heavy reactors



lifes a bitch and so am I
May 3 2005 4:20PM
0 0
profile picture
HSFCpro
Posts: 412 - Karma: 10
8 pounds for both bindings is more than my skis wiegh. One of my skis with a salomon s916 is only barely 7 pounds.

www.highsocietyfreeride.com
May 3 2005 7:27PM
0 0
profile picture
Twintipskier-101
Posts: 521 - Karma: 10
They don't feel that heavy, and the weight that is there is underfoot so it doesn't matter at all.

May 3 2005 7:33PM
0 0
profile picture
GUITARisLIFE3
Posts: 21 - Karma: 10
ok i will then. final decision



lifes a bitch and so am I
May 3 2005 8:03PM
0 0
profile picture
jlm220
Posts: 157 - Karma: 10
word to whoever said the weight makes riding seem more stable...thats how it is for me at least. i used to ride 1080's with the s912's..and they were way squirrely on groomers...i now have chronics +reactors and am pretty pleased with them..i weigh 140 pounds and dont have a problem at all skiing them...i like the weight of the bindings when it comes to spinning though..it helps too for stable landings

May 6 2005 12:48AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)