Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
LemuelI have a brand new pair and was looking at them the other day. The raised up plastic is absolutely retarded and I am probably going to return the bindings because of it. I do not understand why they put it there. It is impossible for the bindings to sit flush. I would like to hear Solly's response to why the bindings are like this.
I wanted to make this thread too but it is so difficult to explain without actually showing the binding to people.
LemuelI have a brand new pair and was looking at them the other day. The raised up plastic is absolutely retarded and I am probably going to return the bindings because of it. I do not understand why they put it there. It is impossible for the bindings to sit flush. I would like to hear Solly's response to why the bindings are like this.
I wanted to make this thread too but it is so difficult to explain without actually showing the binding to people.
Twig
NinetyFourwhile holding the front of the heel track down
NinetyFourA correction to myself. They don't hold the front of the track down. They prevent the steel plate that's holding the front of the track down, from clamping down on the front of the track too much. And if you left the stanchions out, the front of the heel track would be super tight, and wouldn't be able to float at all, which could also lead to improper release qualities.
If you guys need I can post pictures of what I'm trying to explain.
MuggydudeThere's something wrong there- either your skis have volcanoes around the holes
NinetyFourThis could be it to. Incase volcanoes don't make sense, it's basically excess topsheet material that has risen up around the screw hole from drilling and tapping.
S-hand, Here's pictures explaining the floating capability of the rear heel. This is the whole heel track as it would sit on the ski, and the open part would point to the front of the ski:
The top plate should end up in the middle of the expanded outline like so...:
...and when the ski flexes the distance between the front and rear mount holes changes, causing the plate to go forwards...:
...or backwards:
Those stanchions follow the same action:
None of this is possible without the stanchions. They are sliiiiightly thicker than the rest of the heel track, so when they bindings are tightened down, that metal top plate won't clamp down on the heel track, thus allowing it to float freely. The stanchions fit onto the plate like so:
Hopefully that helps! If not, I can try taking video tomorrow. As far as bindings go, I'll be on both Pivot 14's and STH2 13's this year. I really want to compare the top players, and both have their own pros that I just want for certain scenarios.
NinetyFourThey're supposed to be like that.
TwigWent in to my shop and got them checked, they gave me the all clear, said it was normal. Thanks man!
LemuelOk this all makes sense now. I'm assuming that the tabs break loose from the track once you mount them? Mine don't seem like they would break loose that easily (by hand), I don't currently have them nearby, but I'll take a look at them later. My concerns are all cleared up.
As far as Twig's initial question, I don't think it really matters if that front brake track touches the ski or not, it's pretty much excessive material in the first place.